UEFA will permit both Manchester United and Manchester City to play in the same European competitions as their sister clubs this season, the UK Times reports. The decision from UEFA’s Club Financial Control Board (CFCB) is expected to be announced on Monday, albeit with specific conditions.
Under current regulations, clubs with shared ownership cannot participate in the same competition. This rule aims to prevent any potential conflicts of interest and maintain the integrity of the competitions. However, an exception is being made for Manchester United and Manchester City, allowing their affiliated clubs to join them in European tournaments next season.
Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who holds a minority stake in Manchester United, also owns Ligue 1 side Nice. Both Manchester United and Nice have qualified for the Europa League this season. Ratcliffe's ownership stakes in these clubs would traditionally prevent them from competing in the same tournament due to UEFA’s stringent regulations against shared ownership.
Meanwhile, Girona, which is part of the City Football Group, finished third in LaLiga and has secured a spot in the Champions League, the same competition Manchester City will compete in. The City Football Group, which owns Manchester City, is a global sports group that also has stakes in clubs around the world, including Girona in Spain. The group’s influence and network have raised questions about competitive fairness and regulatory compliance.
UEFA’s ruling will permit these arrangements under the condition that Nice and Girona are operated through a “blind trust.” This setup ensures that the clubs' management and operations remain independent of their sister clubs, thereby maintaining the integrity of the competitions. A blind trust would mean that the owners do not have direct control over the clubs' operations, ensuring that each team functions autonomously without influence from the shared ownership.
This decision marks a significant departure from UEFA’s traditional stance on shared ownership and could set a precedent for future cases. It reflects the governing body's willingness to adapt its regulations to the evolving landscape of football club ownership. The modern football world has seen an increase in multi-club ownership, where investors and conglomerates hold stakes in several clubs across different leagues and countries. This trend has prompted UEFA to reconsider and refine its regulations to address new challenges and scenarios.
Critics argue that shared ownership can still lead to potential conflicts of interest, such as match-fixing or preferential treatment, even with measures like a blind trust in place. They believe that strict enforcement of the current rules is necessary to ensure a level playing field for all clubs. On the other hand, proponents of the new ruling highlight the benefits of multi-club ownership, such as shared resources, talent development, and increased investment in the sport. They argue that with proper safeguards, the risks can be mitigated while still allowing clubs to thrive and compete.
UEFA’s decision is likely to be closely scrutinized by other football governing bodies, clubs, and stakeholders around the world. The outcome of this ruling and its implementation could influence future policies and regulations regarding shared ownership in football.
In summary, UEFA’s ruling will enable Manchester United and Manchester City to compete in the same European competitions as their sister clubs, provided specific governance conditions are met. This development underscores UEFA's commitment to balancing the evolving dynamics of football club ownership with the principles of fair play and competitive integrity. As the football world continues to evolve, UEFA's adaptive approach may pave the way for a more flexible yet robust regulatory framework in the sport.
Comments